The Darwin Trilogy The Principles and Practice of Integrative Medicine Majid Ali, M.D. Available Now

WBAI-FM New York
Dr. Ali's
Science, Health and Healing
Radio Shows Online

Editor, The Journal of Integrative Medicine
Formerly, Associate Professor of Pathology (adj.), College of Physicians
and Surgeons of Columbia University, NY
Formerly, President of Staff and Chief Pathologist, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, NJ

Fellow, Royal College of Surgeons of England - Diplomate,
American Board of Anatomic and Clinical Pathology
Diplomate, American Boards of Environmental Medicine
Past
President Capital University of Integrative Medicine

Order Dr. Ali's Books and DVDs at 18006336226.com

Why I Became An Integrative Physician

In 1963, I graduated from King Edward Medical College, Lahore, Pakistan and traveled to England where I obtained a diploma of the fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons of England in 1966. In 1972, I received certification from the American Boards of Anatomic and Clinical pathology. From 1974 to 1996, I served as chairman of the Department of Pathology and Laboratories, Holy Name Hospital, Teaneck, New Jersey. From 1972 to 1998, I also served on the faculty of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York.

My personal perspective of integrative medicine evolved over a period of many years. It began began when I learned to think ecologically. As I recall it one day in 1969, as a pathology resident, I received a large basin brimming with a messy inflamed and distended colon with copious bloody fecal matter spilling out of some tears in its wall. It was not much fun to clean that bowel and take tissue samples for preparing microscopic slides. The next day I examined the slides and observed the expected microscopic features of ulcerative colitis: acute and chronic inflammation, dead and dying immune and other types of cells, ulceration of the lining mucosa, disruption of the general architecture of the colon wall, and pockets of pus. After finishing my study, I took the case to one of my professors. He examined the slides and agreed that it was a case of ulcerative colitis.

The next day, something unexpected happened. Without purpose, I picked another slide of that colon, looked at it, and chanced upon a cluster of large, pale cells forming a discrete round structure. Such a formation is called a granuloma and is considered diagnostic of Crohn's colitis. "Look at that!" I said to myself in surprise. "Now, that granuloma makes it Crohn's colitis, doesn't it? Yesterday it was ulcerative colitis. Today it seems to be Crohn's colitis. Interesting!" I marked the microscopic field with ink and took the slides to a second professor, since the first one was out of the department. He looked at the case and readily diagnosed Crohn's colitis.

The next day as I prepared to carry the slides to one of the secretaries for filing, I picked another slide from the same case and started gazing at an area that showed discrete layers of tissue debris covering small patches of the inner surface of the bowel wall. Those are the features of another common type of colitis called pseudomembranous colitis. "Aha! Another diagnosis!" I exclaimed. "Let's see if I can get someone also to agree with me." That time I purposefully looked for a third professor and decided not to tell him about the diagnoses made by the other two. I pointed out to him the membrane-like structures and he agreed that we had a case of pseudomembranous colitis. I returned to my desk triumphantly. I knew I had a story to tell. Sometime after that Choua said, "Can you make more slides from that colon and see if you can get another professor to diagnose yet another type of colitis from the same colon?" he challenged. I smiled. Worth a try, I murmured to myself.

I went back to that colon and took many more sections of tissues. A technician looked at me, a little annoyed because she had to prepare the slides from all those sections. The next day she brought me several trays of slides and I went to work. In one of the slides, I found areas that showed well-preserved bowel architecture, congested blood vessels, pooled and disintegrating red blood cells in the tissue, and small surface erosions. Bingo! I knew those were the features of another type of colitis called ischemic colitis. I continued my search. I was not disappointed. I found some microscopic fields that showed diagnostic features of a type of colitis called collagenous colitis. "Ah! Another diagnosis!" I congratulated myself and continued study of the case with yet other slides. There were many fields which could only be diagnosed as nonspecific colitis. With some more persistence I found other areas qualifying for other forms of colitis. Getting my teachers to agree to those various diagnoses with different slides of the same colon did not prove to be difficult either. I spoke to Talat, my wife, about my accomplishment, but decided not to tell my professors about it. I did not know how some of them might take it.

Next I turned my attention to my pathology textbooks for a critical study of the causes of those various types of colitis. That turned out to be a yet more fruitful search. I made the second and equally important discovery: The cause of none of those types of colitis was known. It was not that dozens of pages of those texts were not filled with discussion of the etiology (cause) of all those types of colitis. For every type of colitis, some immune disorder, infectious agent, or vascular event was suspected or proposed, but in every case the final conclusion was always the same: The cause is not fully understood.

That search led me to a third important discovery: There is such a large overlap in the clinical symptomatology, microscopic appearances, and suspected causes that there was hardly any point in slavishly adhering to the system of classification of colitis which I was being taught as "science."

The young pathologist in me was jolted by his three discoveries. An image of several blind men surrounding an elephant arose in my mind's eye. During the weeks and months that followed, some vague, ill-defined notion of altered states of bowel ecology began to evolve. It took me several years before I could muster courage to begin writing about what I thought were my awkward notions of bowel pathology, which I thought would be heartily laughed at.

In the late 1970's I introduced the terms "bowel ecosystem," "blood ecosystem," and "liver ecosystem," to express my view that we clinicians need to think ecologically and focus on the relationships among those ecosystems rather than be bound by the prevailing one-cause/one-disease/one-drug model. In a series of essays published in the curriculum of The American Academy of Environmental Medicine, I focused on the impact of environmental factors and the body's redox homeostasis.

In 1983, based on a chance reflection on why stale buffers lose some of their buffering capacity with time, I wondered why butter turns rancid spontaneously, but, but does not turn unrancid spontaneously. Fruit on the kitchen table spoils spontaneously but spoiled fruit does not spoil unspontaneously. Unmindful of the evident relevance of the second law of thermodynamics to those questions, I put forth a hypothesis that spontaneity of oxidation in nature is the primary driving force in molecular and cellular injury, and hence of aging and all disease processes. That simple idea has preoccupied me ever since.

In 1987, in a monograph entitled, "Leaky Cell Membrane Dysfunction," I presented the biochemical and clinical consequences of an increased cell membrane permeability state. Specifically, I drew comparison between the ever- increasing indication of calcium channel blockers in pharmacologic medicine and ever-sharpening focus of nutritionist- physicians on magnesium supplementation. With a leaky cell membrane, what is inside the cell hemorrhages out and what is on the outside of the cell floods the cells innards, hence the clinical benefits of calcium channel blockers and magnesium.

In 1990, with The Cortical Monkey and Healing, I began a series of volumes for the general readership that presented the integrated spiritual and energetic-molecular model of the health/dis-ease/disease continuum. I wrote about a physician's need to think and act like a gardener—for ever seeking to nourish, nurture, and detoxify his patient's body. And, of course, he has to be prepared to serve as a spiritual guide in matters of illness for the sick as well.

In 1996, I accepted the presidency of Capital University of Integrative Medicine, in Washington, D.C., and proposed that integrative medicine be defined as a philosophy of medicine that requires physicians to offer their patients all that is safe and effective without subservience to one or more schools of medical thought.

In 1998, I introduced the term
dysoxygenosis for a state of partial or complete failure of oxygen utilization in cells. I put forth the hypothesis that dysoxygenosis is caused by impaired function of enzymes involved in oxygen homeostasis ("oxyenzymes") and leads to altered expressions of genes induced by hypoxic environment ("oxygenes"). The webs of oxyenzymes are vast, with each entity linked to every other through multiple pathways. The webs of oxygenes are seemingly more complex. All such webs are exquisitely aware of changes in oxygen availability in their microenvironment and vigorously responds to them. When one thing changes in those webs in one way, everything changes in some way. Dysoxygenosis, then, is discerned as a state caused by rich diversity of elements but one that creates the same cellular oxygen dysfunction. I 1998, I also introduced the terms dysfunctional oxygen metabolism and oxygen disorder for readers without medical or biomedical background.

In The Principles and Practice e of Integrative Medicine, I make a case for shifting focus from individual genes, proteins, and other d tissue-organ ecosystems. The basic research in those areas, of course, will take decades if not longer, and enormous funds. However, clinicians need not waiting that long.

Integration in medicine is a matter of integration of the spiritual dynamics of the injury/healing/injury cycles with energetic-ecologic concepts of health and disease. And those concepts must be solidly grounded on sound biomechanical, morphologic and empirical observations.

Human biology is a wonderous web of wenergetic-molecular happenings—a kaleidoscope brought to life by bursts of innate energy, colored by cellular mosaics, moved by paradoxes of complementarity and contrarity.

A Discipline of Wholeness
Human biology is a wondrous web of energetic-molecular happenings—a kaleidoscope brought to life by bursts of innate energy, colored by cellular mosaics, moved by paradoxes of complementarity and contrariety. When one thing moves in a web one way, everything in it moves in some way. Within the injury-healing-injury cycles in that web, life begets death and death begets life.

We physicians have not been ecologic thinkers. We need to be,. To paraphrase Leonardo daVinci, every part is destined to unite with the whole so that it may escape its own incompleteness. In recent years, there have been astounding advances in the dissection of the molecular pathways of healing and dying. The clinician can now see the whole with increasing clarity. Health must be seen as harmony among the molecular and cellular ecosystems of the body —forms of sickness need to be recognized as ecologic disruptions caused by spiritual, nutritional, and ecologic elements. "I will peak of the functions of each part in every direction, putting before your eyes a description of the whole form and substance of man," da Vinci wrote. Today, that every direction must include not only the essential aspects of spiritual equilibrium—which da Vinci was acutely conscious of—but also the other fundamentally issues of oxidosis and disoxygenosis. It is not enough to speak of lymphocytic thyroids or renal lupus as 'diseases' nor is it sufficient to merely substitute echenacea for erthyomycin for recurrent infections or to replace hydrodiuril with hydrogen peroxide foots soaks for leg edema. Wee need a discipline of wholeness—a model of medical holism which would have brought smiles to Socrates, da Vinci, and Darwin.

Notwithstanding the possible virtues of controlled and blinded studies for evaluating g the short-term efficacy of drugs, the prevailing pharmacologic blockade medicine for chronic disease is essentially flawed. Nutritional, ecologic, autoimmune, and degenerative disorders cannot be reversed by synthetic chemicals. It saddens me how often "control- crazed" clinicians deny the sick wonderful opportunities for healing with natural measures only because they think that it is not scientific. Those words may irk some readers, but if I succeed in raising a few discomforting questions in these volumes, my purpose would have been served.

A Scientist Has No Paradigm.

A scientist has but one allegiance—to the truth in his observations. He grows when he continues to observe. A theory may be proposed to explain observation. But first he must continue to observe. A valid observation once made stands on its own. The interpretations of that observation and conclusions drawn from it can—and should—be open to question. But no valid observation, once made, must be discarded because it does not fit into any pre-existing model or concept. This principle is as relevant to clinical medicine as it is to experimental sciences.

In this series of books, I have strived to see the suffering of my patients through their eyes and through the prism of oxygen homeostasis. Taking lead from Socrates, I have pursued questions raised by my patients, subordinating my own prejudices to their sense of things. In Darwin’s footsteps, I have attempted to understand parts only through their relationship with the factors to relationships among molecular, cellular, an whole.

Appointment and Patient Information    CONTACT US      Dr. Ali's Books and DVDs

This information is provided only to provide information, it is never, ever to be used as a self help guideline. Always consult your own health care provider for information or questions on your health! Throughout this website, statements are made pertaining to the properties and/or functions of nutritional supplements. These statements about nutritional supplements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration and are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease

Copyrights on this site:

©Majid Ali ©Aging Healthfully, Inc. ©The Institute of Preventive Medicine
©The Institute of Integrative Medicine ©The Journal of Integrative Medicine

New Jersey - 95 East Main Street Denville, NJ 07834 New York 140 West End Avenue NY, NY 10023